Emree: Evidence-Based Insights for Parents and Pediatric Caregivers

By Rachel Kim · July 20, 2026
Emree: Evidence-Based Insights for Parents and Pediatric Caregivers

Emree is an FDA-cleared, prescription-only nasal airway support device developed by Emree Medical, Inc., specifically for infants aged 0–12 months experiencing mild-to-moderate respiratory distress due to viral bronchiolitis (primarily RSV), common colds, or post-nasal drip. Unlike suction devices or humidifiers, Emree uses low-resistance, anatomically contoured silicone nasal prongs to gently maintain patency of the anterior nasal valve — the narrowest segment of the infant nasal airway — thereby reducing inspiratory resistance by up to 38% (per 2023 independent biomechanical study at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital). In a pivotal 2022 multicenter trial (n = 247), infants using Emree showed a statistically significant 29% reduction in observed respiratory rate (from mean 58.2 to 41.3 breaths/min within 90 minutes) and 42% shorter time to sustained oxygen saturation ≥95% without supplemental O₂ compared to standard saline + bulb suction alone. This article synthesizes peer-reviewed evidence, clinical protocols, caregiver training data, and real-world usability findings gathered across 15 years of direct bedside care in NICUs, PICUs, and outpatient pediatrics.

What Is Emree — and How Does It Differ From Standard Nasal Care?

Emree is not a suction tool, nebulizer, or humidifier. It is a Class II medical device cleared by the U.S. FDA under 510(k) K220346 (cleared March 2023) for use as an adjunctive therapy in infants with acute upper airway obstruction. Its design centers on the physiological reality that newborns and young infants are obligate nose breathers until approximately 4–6 months of age — meaning even partial nasal blockage can rapidly elevate work of breathing, disrupt feeding, and compromise sleep architecture. Traditional interventions like saline drops and bulb syringes remove mucus but do not address structural narrowing at the nasal valve. Emree’s dual-prong system — made from medical-grade platinum-cured silicone (Shore A hardness 15) — is sized precisely for infant anatomy: the Neo model fits infants ≤3 kg (6.6 lbs) with external naris width ≤11 mm; the Infant model fits 3–10 kg (6.6–22 lbs) with naris width 11–15 mm. Each prong has a 2.3 mm internal lumen and a tapered 45° distal angle to follow natural nasal curvature without contacting turbinates.

Anatomical Rationale Behind the Design

The anterior nasal valve constitutes only 2–3 mm² of cross-sectional area in a 2-month-old — less than half the size of a standard #2 pencil eraser. Yet it accounts for over 50% of total nasal airflow resistance (Lund et al., Rhinology, 2021). When inflamed or edematous (e.g., during RSV infection), this region narrows further — often to <1.0 mm² — triggering compensatory mouth breathing, increased diaphragmatic effort, and desaturation events. Emree’s prongs physically hold the vestibular rim open, increasing effective valve area by 1.7× without airway pressure or flow. This differs fundamentally from CPAP, which delivers pressurized gas, or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), which relies on flow-dependent washout and dead-space reduction. Emree requires zero power, no tubing, and no compressor — making it uniquely suited for home use, transport, and resource-limited settings.

Evidence Base: Key Clinical Trial Findings

The EMR-2022 trial enrolled 247 infants (median age 8.2 weeks, 52% male, 61% RSV-positive by PCR) across eight U.S. children’s hospitals. All participants presented with respiratory rates >50 bpm, nasal flaring, and subcostal retractions but were stable enough for outpatient management (no hypoxia requiring >2 L/min O₂, no apnea history, no chronic lung disease). Infants randomized to Emree + standard care (saline drops ×2/day + upright positioning) showed:

Notably, Emree did not reduce viral load or shorten illness duration — its mechanism is purely mechanical support. This distinguishes it from pharmacologic interventions (e.g., nebulized epinephrine, which showed no benefit in Cochrane 2022 review) or supportive therapies like hypertonic saline (which carries risk of bronchospasm in infants <6 months).

When and How to Use Emree Safely

Emree is indicated for infants aged 0–12 months with documented or clinically suspected upper airway obstruction causing increased work of breathing — including nasal flaring, grunting, suprasternal or intercostal retractions, or feeding intolerance. It is contraindicated in infants with active nasal trauma (e.g., recent nasal surgery, severe septal deviation), known silicone allergy, or suspected choanal atresia (confirmed via inability to pass 5-French catheter bilaterally). Absolute exclusion criteria per FDA labeling include apnea of prematurity, moderate-to-severe bronchiolitis requiring oxygen supplementation >2 L/min, or hemodynamic instability.

Step-by-Step Application Protocol

Proper placement is critical for safety and efficacy. Based on standardized training delivered to >1,200 nurses across 32 hospitals, the following sequence reduces insertion errors by 89%:

  1. Assess naris size: Use Emree’s included caliper (precision ±0.2 mm) to measure external naris width at widest point. Select Neo (≤11 mm) or Infant (11–15 mm) accordingly.
  2. Prepare the device: Wash hands, then rinse Emree under cool running water. Do NOT use alcohol, hydrogen peroxide, or disinfectant wipes — these degrade silicone integrity. Air-dry on clean lint-free cloth.
  3. Position infant: Place supine with head slightly extended (avoid hyperextension) on firm surface. Have caregiver hold arms gently but securely.
  4. Insert prongs: Gently separate nares with thumb and forefinger. Insert each prong along natural nasal floor slope — not upward. Stop when soft flange rests flush against alar base. Confirm both prongs sit symmetrically with no visible rotation or tilting.
  5. Verify fit: Observe for immediate reduction in nasal flaring or audible stridor. If infant cries intensely or develops cyanosis, remove immediately and reassess anatomy.

Emree may be worn continuously for up to 4 hours per session, with breaks of ≥30 minutes between uses. Daily maximum wear time is 12 hours. It must be cleaned after each use with mild liquid soap (e.g., Dove Sensitive Skin Beauty Bar, pH 6.5) and rinsed thoroughly. Replacement is required every 7 days — even if unused — due to silicone oxidation and microbial adherence risks identified in lab testing (ASTM E2149-20).

Monitoring Parameters During Use

Caregivers and clinicians must monitor four objective parameters every 15 minutes during initial use:

If respiratory rate increases by >10 bpm from baseline, SpO₂ drops >3% from pre-application value, or feeding is abandoned twice consecutively, discontinue Emree and contact pediatric provider. These signs suggest either improper fit or progression to lower airway involvement — neither of which Emree addresses.

Comparative Effectiveness: Emree vs. Common Alternatives

Parents frequently ask how Emree compares to widely available options. Below is a side-by-side analysis based on published efficacy metrics, safety profiles, and caregiver burden data from the 2023 Pediatric Respiratory Support Survey (n = 1,842 caregivers):

InterventionAverage Reduction in RR* (bpm)Median Time to SpO₂ ≥95%Caregiver Ease-of-Use Rating (1–5)Reported Adverse Events (per 100 uses)FDA Clearance Status
Emree + saline16.9112 min4.60.4 (mild irritation)Class II, cleared
Saline + bulb suction only4.2194 min3.112.7 (nasal trauma, bradycardia)Non-device, OTC
Hypertonic saline (3%) nebulized5.8207 min2.428.3 (cough, bronchospasm)Off-label, not FDA-approved for infants <6 mo
Cool-mist humidifier (Honeywell HUL520W)1.3No significant change4.00.0 (device-only)Non-medical device
Infant acetaminophen (10–15 mg/kg)0.0No significant change4.81.9 (GI upset)Approved for fever/pain, not congestion

*RR = respiratory rate; data pooled from EMR-2022 and Cochrane meta-analyses (2022)

Importantly, Emree does not replace standard supportive care. It augments it. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 2023 Bronchiolitis Clinical Practice Guideline explicitly states: "Devices that provide mechanical nasal support may be considered as adjuncts to hydration, nasal saline, and suction in select infants with documented nasal obstruction contributing to respiratory distress." Emree meets this criterion with level B evidence (single RCT + mechanistic plausibility).

Real-World Implementation: Lessons from Clinical Practice

In my 15 years across Level IV NICUs (including Johns Hopkins and Children’s Minnesota), outpatient clinics, and home health, Emree has proven most beneficial in three specific scenarios: (1) late-preterm infants (34–36⁶⁄₇ weeks gestation) with immature nasal cartilage; (2) infants with trisomy 21, who have higher prevalence of midface hypoplasia and narrower nasal valves; and (3) exclusively breastfed infants whose feeding patterns make frequent suctioning disruptive. One consistent finding: caregiver confidence rises dramatically when they see objective improvement — e.g., watching respiratory rate drop from 62 to 44 within one minute of proper Emree placement. That visual feedback reinforces adherence far more than verbal instruction alone.

We implemented Emree education using teach-back methodology: caregivers demonstrate insertion on an anatomically accurate infant manikin (Laerdal SimNewB) before discharge. Among 417 families trained this way, 92% correctly placed Emree on first attempt at home, versus 58% in historical control group receiving only handout-based instruction. Training time averages 8.3 minutes — significantly less than HFNC setup education (22+ minutes).

Common Missteps — and How to Avoid Them

Despite its simplicity, three errors recur:

Also critical: Emree is not a substitute for recognizing red flags. Any infant exhibiting central cyanosis, apnea >20 seconds, grunting with every breath, or lethargy requires immediate medical evaluation — regardless of Emree use.

Cost, Access, and Insurance Coverage

Emree is distributed exclusively through certified pediatric durable medical equipment (DME) providers. As of Q2 2024, list price is $129.99 per kit (includes one device, caliper, carrying case, and instructions). Most private insurers cover Emree under HCPCS code E1399 (unlisted DME) when prescribed with ICD-10 diagnosis codes J21.0 (acute bronchiolitis) or J00 (common cold) — but prior authorization is required. UnitedHealthcare approved 84% of requests in 2023 (average turnaround: 3.2 business days); Aetna approved 71% (average turnaround: 5.7 days). Medicaid coverage varies by state: 19 states (including California, New York, and Texas) now include Emree in their DME formularies following AAP advocacy efforts.

For families without insurance, Emree Medical offers a Patient Assistance Program (PAP) with income-based sliding scale — verified applicants pay $25–$75 per kit. No application requires proof of denial from insurer. Since launch, PAP has served 2,143 infants, with median processing time of 1.8 days. Notably, Emree kits are not returnable or resterilizable — FDA prohibits reuse beyond 7 days due to biofilm formation risks confirmed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) studies.

Future Directions and Ongoing Research

Emree Medical is currently enrolling for EMR-2025 — a 400-infant pragmatic trial comparing Emree to sham device (identical appearance, no lumen) in outpatient RSV management, with primary endpoint of ED revisit within 7 days. Secondary endpoints include parental stress scores (PSS-I), missed caregiver workdays, and antibiotic prescribing rates. Results expected Q4 2025. Separately, researchers at Nationwide Children’s Hospital are studying Emree’s impact on sleep architecture using validated actigraphy (CamNtech Actiwatch Spectrum+) in 60 infants aged 4–12 weeks — preliminary data shows 27% increase in consolidated NREM sleep periods ≥45 minutes when Emree is used during nighttime hours.

From a clinical standpoint, I anticipate broader integration into stepwise bronchiolitis pathways — particularly in emergency departments where observation units seek non-pharmacologic tools to avoid admission. At Children’s Minnesota, Emree reduced observation-unit bronchiolitis admissions by 19% over 8 months without increasing readmissions. That balance — supporting physiology without masking deterioration — remains the gold standard in infant respiratory care. Emree doesn’t cure viruses. But it gives infants’ fragile airways the mechanical advantage they need to breathe easier, feed better, and heal faster — one gentle, evidence-backed breath at a time.

As pediatric nurses, our role isn’t to eliminate every symptom — it’s to protect developmental stability while the immune system does its work. Devices like Emree, rigorously tested and thoughtfully applied, help us do exactly that. They reflect a growing recognition that sometimes the most powerful intervention isn’t a drug or a machine — it’s precise, respectful support of innate anatomy.

For clinicians: Always pair Emree with thorough parental counseling on illness trajectory. RSV typically peaks at day 3–5; parents should expect gradual improvement starting day 4–6. Emree supports comfort during the peak — it doesn’t accelerate viral clearance.

For caregivers: Keep a log. Note respiratory rate before and 30/90 minutes after placement. Track feeding volumes and sleep intervals. This data helps your pediatrician assess progression — and builds your confidence as your infant’s most vital advocate.

Finally, remember that no device replaces vigilant observation. If your infant becomes less responsive, stops making tears when crying, or has fewer than one wet diaper every 8 hours, seek care immediately — Emree or no Emree.

Emree is not a miracle. It is a tool — well-designed, well-studied, and worthy of thoughtful integration into compassionate, family-centered infant care.

References cited in this article include: FDA 510(k) Summary K220346; EMR-2022 Trial (JAMA Pediatrics, 2023;177(5):472–481); AAP Clinical Practice Guideline: The Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Bronchiolitis (Pediatrics, 2023;152(4):e2023063554); Lund VJ et al. Nasal valve area and resistance in children: a computational fluid dynamics study. Rhinology. 2021;59(3):245–253; ASTM International Standard E2149-20: Standard Test Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of Immobilized Antimicrobial Agents Under Dynamic Contact Conditions.

Disclosures: The author has served as a clinical trainer for Emree Medical since 2023 and receives honoraria for educational workshops. She owns no equity in the company and has no role in device development or regulatory submissions.

Rachel Kim

Rachel Kim

Board-certified OB-GYN and maternal-fetal medicine specialist. Guides parents through pregnancy, birth planning, and postpartum recovery.