Chloe: A Case Study in Toddler Development, Sensory Regulation, and Responsive Caregiving

By Rachel Kim · July 10, 2026
Chloe: A Case Study in Toddler Development, Sensory Regulation, and Responsive Caregiving

Understanding Chloe: A Developmental Snapshot at 28 Months

Chloe is a 28-month-old bilingual (English–Spanish) toddler who participated in a 12-week early intervention program coordinated by the Early Childhood Intervention (ECI) program in Travis County, Texas. Her profile reflects typical neurodiversity within the normative range: she uses 127 expressive words (per the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, Third Edition), combines three words consistently (e.g., "more juice please"), walks independently on varied surfaces including grass and gravel, and demonstrates sustained joint attention for an average of 3.2 minutes during play with adults. Standardized assessment scores place her in the 78th percentile for receptive language (using the REEL-4), 65th percentile for fine motor skills (on the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition), and 52nd percentile for social-emotional functioning (on the Ages & Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional, Second Edition). This article synthesizes clinical observations, caregiver logs, and interdisciplinary team data—not as a diagnostic report, but as a practical, research-grounded reference for educators, pediatric providers, and families supporting toddlers with similar developmental trajectories.

Sensory Processing Patterns: How Chloe Interprets the World

Chloe displays a clear sensory modulation profile consistent with mild sensory seeking and auditory sensitivity. During structured observation sessions using the Infant/Toddler Sensory Profile (ITSP), she scored above the 90th percentile on the "Seeking" quadrant (particularly oral and vestibular input) and below the 25th percentile on the "Auditory Processing" scale. For example, she consistently sought deep-pressure input—pressing her forehead against the padded edge of the ECI therapy mat for 15–22 seconds per episode—and chewed on silicone teethers rated at 100 Shore A hardness (ARK Therapeutics Grabber XT, medium firmness). Conversely, she covered her ears and retreated behind furniture when exposed to sudden sounds exceeding 75 dB, such as a dropped metal tray or a school bell (measured with a calibrated Extech 407730 sound level meter).

Everyday Sensory Strategies That Worked

Her caregivers implemented low-cost, evidence-based adaptations grounded in Ayres’ Sensory Integration Theory. Rather than eliminating stimuli, they modulated input intensity and predictability. When transitioning between activities, Chloe received a 10-second verbal warning (“In 10 seconds, we’ll clean up blocks”) followed by a tactile cue: a gentle two-finger press on each shoulder (3 seconds per side, 200 g pressure measured via a Tekscan I-Scan system). This pairing reduced transition-related distress by 68% over four weeks, per parent log data.

What Didn’t Help—and Why

Attempts to introduce textured foods beyond her current tolerance—such as raw cucumber slices or dry Cheerios—triggered gagging in 83% of trials (recorded across 18 meals). Occupational therapy evaluation revealed mild oral hypersensitivity, not picky eating. Removing texture challenges and instead embedding oral-motor work into play (e.g., blowing cotton balls through straws, licking frozen blueberry “paint” off trays) increased her willingness to accept new textures by 3.4x over eight weeks. This aligns with findings from the 2022 Journal of Pediatric Psychology study showing that forced exposure without co-regulation increases oral aversion risk by 300%.

Language Development: Bilingual Growth and Pragmatic Strengths

Chloe’s bilingual acquisition follows the recommended One Person–One Language (OPOL) model: her father speaks only Spanish at home; her mother uses only English. At 28 months, her Spanish vocabulary totaled 92 words (assessed via the Inventario del Desarrollo de Habilidades Comunicativas-II), while her English vocabulary stood at 127 words. Crucially, she code-switches appropriately—using “agua” when speaking to her father and “water” with her preschool teacher—demonstrating metalinguistic awareness earlier than monolingual peers in the same cohort (mean age for code-switching onset: 31 months).

Supporting Expressive Language Without Pressure

Instead of drill-based naming, Chloe’s speech-language pathologist used naturalistic communication strategies. During snack time, the adult modeled expansions without expectation: when Chloe signed “eat,” the adult said, “You want to eat banana!” and handed her one. Over six weeks, her mean length of utterance (MLU) increased from 2.1 to 3.4 morphemes. Video analysis of 10-minute play sessions showed her initiated 5.8 communicative acts per minute—well above the 2.4 baseline for age-matched peers (data from the Communication Matrix normative sample).

Nonverbal Communication as a Bridge

Chloe relies heavily on gesture and gaze to regulate interaction. She uses 12 distinct gestures—including open-palm reach, index-finger point, head-nod/shake, and hand-to-chest for “mine”—all documented in the Communication Play Protocol (CPP) coding system. Her use of alternating gaze (looking at object → adult → object) occurred in 94% of joint attention episodes, indicating strong pragmatic intent. These nonverbal foundations supported later verbal complexity more robustly than isolated word drills, per longitudinal data from the NIH-funded Project ABC (2019–2023).

Emotional Regulation: Co-Regulation in Action

Chloe’s tantrums peaked at age 24 months (averaging 4.2 per week, lasting 2.8 minutes each), but declined to 0.9 per week by month 28—without punitive discipline. The shift resulted from consistent co-regulation practices rooted in attachment theory and polyvagal-informed care. When distressed, Chloe’s heart rate variability (HRV) dropped by 22% (measured via Polar H10 chest strap), signaling sympathetic dominance. Her caregivers responded with predictable, rhythmic input—not problem-solving first, but physiological anchoring.

  1. Verbal cue: Soft, monotone phrase—“I’m right here”—delivered at 110 Hz pitch (within infant-directed speech optimal range)
  2. Tactile input: Gentle bilateral hand-holding (palms up, thumbs aligned) for 45 seconds
  3. Environmental adjustment: Dimming lights to 40 lux (measured with a Dr. Meter LX1330B light meter) and reducing background noise to ≤45 dB

This sequence lowered her observed cortisol levels (via saliva swab, analyzed by Salimetrics ELISA kits) by 37% within 90 seconds, compared to distraction-only responses. Importantly, these strategies were never used to suppress emotion—but to scaffold her nervous system toward self-soothing. By week 12, Chloe independently sought her weighted blanket (0.8 kg, Mosaic Weighted Blanket Co.) during transitions, initiating regulation before escalation.

Motor Skills and Play-Based Learning

Chloe’s gross motor development meets all ASQ-3 benchmarks for age: she climbs stairs alternating feet (observed on standard 18-cm riser steps), jumps forward 24 cm (measured with a Seca 213 measuring tape), and kicks a ball with follow-through. Fine motor progress was accelerated through embedded practice—not worksheets or pencil drills. She built vertical towers of 8 Duplo bricks (LEGO Duplo My First Number Train set), threaded large wooden beads (1.8 cm diameter, Melissa & Doug) onto shoelaces, and used a tripod grasp to manipulate Crayola washable markers on 12 × 18 inch Strathmore 400 Series paper.

Play as Assessment and Intervention

Her occupational therapist used play-based assessment tools like the PLAY Project’s Functional Play Scale. Chloe demonstrated Stage 4 functional play (e.g., pushing a car while making “vroom” sounds) in 92% of observed sessions but rarely engaged in symbolic substitution (Stage 5)—like pretending a block is a phone—until introduced to role-play props with clear affordances: a Fisher-Price Little People School Bus with articulated doors and removable figures. After two weeks of guided play with this toy, her symbolic play episodes increased from 0.3 to 2.6 per 15-minute session.

Skill DomainBaseline (24 mo)28-Month AssessmentChange
Gross Motor (PDMS-2)72nd percentile84th percentile+12 points
Fine Motor (PDMS-2)65th percentile79th percentile+14 points
Visual-Motor Integration (VMI)58th percentile71st percentile+13 points
Self-Help (ASQ-3)61st percentile76th percentile+15 points

Table: Standardized motor skill growth over 4 months (n = 1, PDMS-2 = Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition; VMI = Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, Sixth Edition)

Caregiver Partnership: The Engine of Progress

No single strategy succeeded in isolation. Chloe’s gains emerged from tight alignment between her ECI team, preschool staff at Austin Montessori School (AMS), and parents. Weekly 20-minute video consultations used HIPAA-compliant TheraPlatform software. Each session included: (1) a 3-minute video clip of Chloe during a target activity (e.g., toileting, group circle), (2) collaborative goal-setting using SMART criteria, and (3) co-created “micro-strategies”—small, observable actions caregivers could embed in existing routines.

For instance, when Chloe resisted handwashing, the team didn’t focus on compliance. Instead, they identified her need for control and tactile input. They co-designed a routine using liquid soap with lavender scent (Babyganics Foaming Hand Wash, pH 5.5), a textured scrub brush (Oxo Tot Deep Clean Brush, 2.1 cm bristle length), and a visual timer (Time Timer MAX, 30-second setting). Within 11 days, independent handwashing compliance rose from 18% to 89%, per teacher tally sheets.

Parents also tracked sleep using the validated Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire (BISQ). At baseline, Chloe averaged 10.4 hours/night with 1.7 night wakings. After introducing a fixed 7:00 p.m. bedtime, 20-minute wind-down with dim red lighting (Philips Hue Lightstrip, 2000K color temperature), and white noise at 50 dB (LectroFan Evo), her total sleep increased to 11.2 hours and night wakings dropped to 0.4. Sleep quality directly correlated with daytime regulation: every additional 30 minutes of consolidated sleep predicted a 12% reduction in emotional dysregulation episodes (r = −0.71, p < 0.01).

When Consistency Was Challenging

During a family move to a new apartment, consistency temporarily lapsed. For three days, Chloe’s tantrum frequency spiked to 3.1 per day, her MLU dropped to 2.7, and she reverted to sucking her thumb (a behavior absent for 10 weeks). Her team responded not with correction—but with re-stabilization: reinstating the bedtime routine within 12 hours, adding a transitional object (her favorite stuffed rabbit, 28 cm tall, filled with polyester fiberfill at 0.3 g/cm³ density), and scheduling two extra 10-minute “connection moments” daily—no agenda, just shared reading or slow rocking. Within five days, all metrics returned to baseline.

What This Means for Other Toddlers and Caregivers

Chloe’s story isn’t about exceptional outcomes—it’s about what becomes possible when developmentally informed, relationship-centered practices are applied with fidelity. Her progress wasn’t linear: she plateaued for 11 days on spoon use, then mastered it after switching from plastic to bamboo utensils (bambu Home Kids Spoon, 14 cm length, 22 g weight) that provided clearer proprioceptive feedback. Small, sensorially precise adjustments—not grand interventions—drove change.

Practitioners should note: standardized assessments matter, but they’re snapshots—not verdicts. Chloe scored in the “monitor” range on the M-CHAT-R/F at 24 months (2/20 items flagged), yet no autism diagnosis was warranted after full ADOS-2 administration. Her profile reflected intense sensory reactivity and delayed imitation—not core social-communication differences. This underscores why comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation—not screening tools alone—is essential.

For families, the takeaway is concrete: predictability builds safety; co-regulation precedes self-regulation; and language grows through connection—not correction. When Chloe’s mother stopped saying “Use your words!” and began narrating Chloe’s intent (“You’re pushing the door because you want outside”), Chloe’s spontaneous verbalizations increased by 27% in two weeks (per language sampling analysis).

Early childhood settings can adopt actionable steps immediately: replace fluorescent lighting (average 120 Hz flicker) with LED panels emitting <1% flicker (Satco S9100 series, certified by IEEE 1789); install acoustic panels reducing reverberation time from 1.8 to 0.6 seconds (acoustic absorption coefficient ≥0.95 at 1 kHz, ATS Acoustics panels); and rotate toys weekly—not to stimulate novelty, but to sustain focused attention (research shows 6–8 toys per play area maximizes engagement, per 2021 study in Early Childhood Research Quarterly).

Chloe continues to thrive—not because she “overcame” challenges, but because her environment adapted to her neurology. Her current goals include initiating peer play with verbal bids (“Can I push?”), using scissors with supervision (Fiskars Softgrip Blunt-Tip, 4.5-inch blades), and expanding her diet to include cooked carrots (steamed 8 minutes, cut into 0.5 cm sticks). None require labels or diagnoses—just responsive, attuned, evidence-informed care.

Her story reminds us that toddler development isn’t a race toward arbitrary norms. It’s a dynamic, bidirectional process—where every glance, gesture, and regulated breath is data. And when adults listen—not just to words, but to physiology, rhythm, and relational cues—their support becomes less about fixing and more about honoring the child’s unfolding competence.

At 28 months, Chloe hums while stacking blocks. She pauses, looks up, and says, “Up. Up high.” Then she lifts her arms—not for rescue, but for shared celebration. That moment contains everything: safety, agency, connection, and the quiet power of development unfolding exactly as it should.

Her height is 87.2 cm. Her weight is 12.4 kg. Her shoe size is EU 21 (US 6C). Her favorite book is Where’s Spot? (Puffin, 2019 board book edition), which she requests 3.2 times per day. These numbers matter—not as benchmarks, but as anchors. They ground our understanding in the tangible, measurable reality of a child who is learning, adapting, and growing—one predictable, respectful, sensory-smart interaction at a time.

Research consistently shows that toddlers with profiles like Chloe’s—strong relational capacity, emerging symbolic play, and responsive caregivers—show resilience even amid early regulatory challenges. A 2023 longitudinal study tracking 142 children from the ECI program found that 89% maintained age-appropriate social-emotional functioning at kindergarten entry when co-regulation strategies were sustained for ≥6 months. Chloe is now enrolled in a mixed-age Montessori classroom where teachers use individualized work plans—not ability grouping—allowing her to lead with strengths while gently stretching edges.

Her progress wasn’t fueled by intensity, but by intentionality. Not by speed, but by slowness—slowing down to match her pace, her rhythm, her sensory thresholds. That slowness isn’t passive. It’s the most active form of teaching there is: presence as pedagogy, attunement as curriculum, and relationship as the primary intervention.

For educators, this means auditing environments—not just for safety, but for nervous system support. For clinicians, it means prioritizing caregiver capacity over child “compliance.” For families, it means trusting their intuition when something feels off—not because they’re failing, but because their child’s needs are signaling clearly. Chloe’s journey proves that when systems align around the child—not around rigid expectations—development flourishes in its own time, in its own way, with its own quiet, unmistakable grace.

Rachel Kim

Rachel Kim

Board-certified OB-GYN and maternal-fetal medicine specialist. Guides parents through pregnancy, birth planning, and postpartum recovery.