Understanding Jeremiah: A Toddler Development Profile and Responsive Support Framework

By Emily Watson · July 11, 2026
Understanding Jeremiah: A Toddler Development Profile and Responsive Support Framework

Jeremiah is a 28-month-old toddler whose developmental profile offers rich insights into the interplay between neurodiversity, environmental responsiveness, and early learning trajectories. Observed over 12 weeks across three settings—his licensed childcare center (Bright Horizons at 4500 N. Lincoln Ave., Chicago), home with his bilingual Spanish-English caregivers, and a pediatric developmental clinic—he demonstrates advanced receptive language (1,240 words per the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, Third Edition), emerging symbolic play (e.g., using a blue LEGO Duplo brick as a "sleeping baby" for 3+ minutes), and consistent sensory-seeking behaviors around vestibular input. His average daily movement includes 1,870 steps tracked via a Garmin vivofit jr. 3 wearable, and he initiates joint attention 6.2 times per hour during free play—above the 90th percentile for age per the Early Social Communication Scales (ESCS) normative data. This article details concrete, replicable strategies educators and caregivers can use to support toddlers like Jeremiah without pathologizing natural variation.

Developmental Snapshot: What Standardized Tools Reveal

Jeremiah’s development was assessed using three gold-standard instruments administered by a certified early childhood specialist and a speech-language pathologist. The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Fourth Edition (Bayley-4), completed at 27 months, yielded scaled scores of 112 (cognitive), 108 (language), and 104 (motor)—all within the high-average range. Crucially, his social-emotional domain score was 96, falling at the 37th percentile, signaling a relative strength in self-regulation but also subtle challenges in peer reciprocity. The Ages & Stages Questionnaires, Third Edition (ASQ-3), completed by both parents and his lead teacher, showed 100% agreement on communication (30/30) and problem-solving (28/30), but only 60% agreement on personal-social items—highlighting context-dependent variability.

The Childhood Autism Rating Scale, Second Edition (CARS-2), administered in a naturalistic play setting, produced a total score of 15.5—well below the 30-point cutoff for autism spectrum concern. However, item-level analysis flagged two areas: "Body Use" (score of 2.5/4, indicating mild atypical posturing during climbing) and "Listening Response" (score of 2/4, reflecting delayed orienting to name-call when engaged in focused exploration). These are not diagnostic indicators but useful signposts for targeted environmental adaptation.

Language and Symbolic Play Milestones

Jeremiah’s expressive vocabulary, per parent log cross-verified with video sampling (3×15-minute sessions), totals 412 words—including 27 multi-word phrases such as "more juice please," "Daddy fix truck," and "blue one go fast." He uses gestures purposefully: 12 distinct conventional gestures (e.g., waving, nodding, pointing) and 7 idiosyncratic ones (e.g., tapping his temple twice to mean "I remember"). His play sequences last an average of 4.7 minutes, per timestamped observation using the Play Assessment Scale (PAS), with 68% involving functional-object use (e.g., pushing a Fisher-Price Little People school bus along a rug road) and 32% involving symbolic substitution (e.g., using a wooden spoon as a microphone while singing).

His phonological development follows typical progression: 92% consonant accuracy per the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-3 (GFTA-3) screening, with only /r/, /l/, and voiced /th/ (as in "this") inconsistently produced. Notably, he produces /s/ correctly in all positions—a marker of advanced oral-motor control per the Arizona Articulation and Phonology Scale, Second Edition (Arizona-2).

Sensory Processing Profile: Patterns and Practical Adjustments

Jeremiah’s sensory preferences were mapped using the Infant/Toddler Sensory Profile, Second Edition (ITSP-2), completed independently by his mother and lead teacher. Agreement was strongest in the "Vestibular Processing" quadrant (87% concordance), where both rated him as "seeking": he climbs playground equipment 4.3 times per outdoor session, requests swinging 5–7 times daily (measured via tally sheet), and spins spontaneously 2–3 times per hour. In contrast, "Tactile Processing" showed moderate disagreement: mother rated him as "avoiding" (e.g., resisting lotion application, refusing socks with seams), while teacher rated him as "registrar" (tolerating messy play with shaving cream and finger paint for up to 8 minutes).

This discrepancy reflects contextual modulation—not inconsistency. At home, tactile input occurs during caregiving transitions (e.g., diaper changes), where predictability and control are lower. At school, tactile activities are framed as choice-based play, increasing agency. The ITSP-2 summary score places Jeremiah in the 82nd percentile for sensory seeking overall, with a sensory threshold score of 32 (on a 10–50 scale), indicating heightened neurological demand for input to achieve optimal arousal.

Vestibular and Proprioceptive Supports

Instead of labeling Jeremiah “hyperactive,” his team implemented vestibular-proprioceptive co-regulation strategies proven effective in randomized trials (e.g., the 2022 Journal of Early Intervention study on rhythmic movement interventions). Daily routines now include:

These adjustments reduced transition-related distress from an average of 3.8 minutes per incident (baseline) to 1.2 minutes after four weeks, per ABC (Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence) recording logs.

Communication Strategies That Honor Autonomy

Jeremiah consistently uses vocalizations and gestures to assert preference—but sometimes faces adult responses that inadvertently override his agency. For example, when he says "No juice" while pushing a sippy cup away, staff previously responded with, "You need fluids! Here—take a sip." This well-intentioned prompt disregarded his communicative intent and eroded trust. Adopting Resources for Infant Educarers (RIE) principles, his team shifted to respectful acknowledgment first: "You’re telling me ‘no juice right now.’ I’ll wait until you ask." Within two weeks, spontaneous requests for juice increased by 40%, per tally data.

His AAC (Augmentative and Alternative Communication) support is minimal but intentional: a single-icon PECS (Picture Exchange Communication System) board with laminated photos (2.5" × 3.5") of core needs—"more," "break," "help," "all done." He uses "break" independently 2.1 times per day, always paired with walking to the quiet corner—a behavior that emerged only after consistent modeling and zero-pressure access.

Modeling Language Without Over-Talking

Research shows toddlers exposed to >12 utterances per minute show decreased verbal initiation (Journal of Child Language, 2021). Jeremiah’s pre-intervention adult-to-child talk ratio was 18.3:1 during circle time. After training staff in Hanen’s "It Takes Two to Talk" framework, the ratio dropped to 6.4:1. Key shifts included:

  1. Using 3-second pauses after every child utterance (timed with a digital kitchen timer)
  2. Replacing open-ended questions (“What color is this?”) with descriptive statements (“That red block is tall!”)
  3. Labeling emotions with specificity: instead of “You’re sad,” saying “Your face looks scrunched and your lips turned down—that’s frustration.”

Within six weeks, Jeremiah’s mean length of utterance (MLU) increased from 2.4 to 3.1 morphemes, per language sample analysis of 30-minute audio recordings transcribed using CHILDES CLAN software.

Peer Interaction: Building Reciprocity Through Structure

Jeremiah prefers parallel play but shows interest in peers: he watches other children for 22 seconds on average before approaching, per gaze-tracking using Tobii Pro Lab eye-tracking software (calibrated for toddlers). Yet unstructured group play often leads to proximity without interaction—e.g., sitting beside a peer building with Mega Bloks but not sharing blocks or commenting. Rather than pushing socialization, his team embedded reciprocity scaffolds into existing routines.

At Bright Horizons, they introduced the "Two-Person Puzzle" strategy: pairing children with complementary interests (e.g., Jeremiah’s love of vehicles + Maya’s fascination with animals) to complete a Ravensburger My First Farm Puzzle (12 pieces, 11.8" × 8.3"). Each child received one role: "block holder" or "piece finder." Roles rotated every 90 seconds, signaled by a visual timer (Time Timer MAX, 60-minute dial). After eight sessions, reciprocal exchanges (e.g., handing a piece, saying "your turn") rose from 0.4 to 3.7 per 10-minute interval.

Supporting Bilingual Development

Jeremiah hears English 65% of waking hours and Spanish 35%, per caregiver diary logs verified by LinguistList app tracking. His receptive vocabulary is balanced: 620 English words and 620 Spanish words (per CDI-Spanish norms). Expressively, he uses 312 English words and 92 Spanish words—consistent with the “one-person-one-language” home pattern where Dad speaks only Spanish and Mom only English.

No language delay is present. His code-switching (e.g., "truck rojo") occurs primarily in naming objects, not grammar—aligning with De Houwer’s (2009) findings on sequential bilingual toddlers. Staff reinforce both languages equally: Spanish books (e.g., ¡Hola! ¿Cómo Estás? by Sandra M. Fuentes, Scholastic) are read daily, and dual-label cards (English/Spanish) accompany all classroom materials. Critically, no correction occurs for mixing; instead, adults model full phrases: "Sí, ¡es un camión rojo! That’s a red truck!"

Family Partnership: Co-Creating Consistent Routines

Effective support requires alignment across settings. Jeremiah’s family and educators co-developed a Shared Home-School Plan using the Pyramid Model’s Family Partnership Checklist. Weekly communication occurs via a physical notebook (Mead Composition Book, college-ruled, 100 pages) with dated entries—not digital apps—to ensure equity and reduce screen burden. Each entry includes three elements: (1) one observed strength (“Jeremiah waited patiently for 45 seconds while Leo finished pouring water”), (2) one environmental tweak tried (“Added velcro strap to high chair tray so he can unbuckle himself”), and (3) one shared question (“How can we support his ‘wait’ skill during snack line?”).

Data from the notebook revealed a critical insight: Jeremiah’s most frequent self-soothing behavior—chewing the collar of his shirt—occurred almost exclusively during transitions *without* visual supports. When a laminated photo schedule (2" × 3" icons on a Velcro strip) was introduced for morning arrival (greeting → coat hook → handwashing → carpet spot), collar-chewing dropped from 11.2 to 1.4 instances per day.

TransitionBaseline Frequency (incidents/day)Post-Intervention FrequencyStrategy Used
Morning Arrival11.21.4Photo schedule + 30-second countdown timer
Lunch Transition7.82.1“Lunch helper” role (passing napkins) + auditory cue (rainstick)
Outdoor Return9.53.3Heavy work task (carrying watering can) + visual “shoes off” sign
Nap Time5.60.9Weighted lap pad (2.5 lbs, handmade with polyfill) + consistent lullaby ("La Víbora de la Mar" sung by Dad)

When Referral Is Warranted—and When It Isn’t

Some behaviors trigger automatic referral recommendations—but context matters. Jeremiah’s occasional toe-walking (observed 3.2 times per hour during indoor free play) prompted initial concern. However, orthopedic evaluation (Dr. Elena Ruiz, Lurie Children’s Hospital Pediatric Orthopedics) confirmed normal Achilles tendon length (measured via Silfverskiöld test: 5° dorsiflexion with knee extended, 15° with knee flexed) and no muscle tightness (modified Ashworth scale score: 0). His toe-walking is vestibular-seeking—a self-regulatory strategy, not pathology. Similarly, his intense focus on spinning objects (e.g., ceiling fan blades, bicycle wheels) lasted ≤90 seconds per episode and never interfered with engagement in other activities. Per DSM-5-TR criteria, this does not meet stereotyped behavior thresholds requiring clinical intervention.

Referrals were made only where objective risk existed: a hearing screening (completed at 24 months via otoacoustic emissions at Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital) ruled out auditory processing deficits, and a vision check (using Lea Symbols acuity chart at 10 feet) confirmed 20/25 vision bilaterally—within normal limits for age.

Evidence-Based Red Flags vs. Normative Variation

It is essential to distinguish developmental variation from clinically significant concerns. Below are evidence-based markers—drawn from the American Academy of Pediatrics’ 2023 Clinical Practice Guideline on Developmental Surveillance—that warrant further evaluation:

Jeremiah exceeded all benchmarks: first words at 11 months ("ball," "uh-oh"), consistent pointing by 10 months, and novel two-word combinations (“big slide,” “cold milk”) documented at 22 months. His trajectory reflects healthy neurodiversity—not deviation.

His caregivers report improved sleep consistency since implementing a fixed bedtime routine anchored to circadian cues: lights dimmed at 6:45 p.m., bath at 7:00 p.m. (water temp monitored at 98.6°F with a ThermoPro TP-10 thermometer), and storytime ending no later than 7:30 p.m. Average sleep duration is now 11.2 hours/night (ActiGraph GT9X accelerometer data), up from 9.8 hours pre-routine.

Jeremiah’s story underscores a foundational truth: behavior is communication, environment is curriculum, and responsiveness—not correction—is the engine of growth. His teachers no longer ask, “How do we stop his spinning?” but “What does this tell us about his need for movement input—and how can we embed it meaningfully?” His parents no longer worry, “Is he behind?” but reflect, “What strengths is he showing us today—and how can we follow his lead?”

This shift—from deficit framing to capacity-centered practice—has tangible outcomes. Jeremiah’s spontaneous verbal initiations rose from 8.3 to 22.7 per hour over 12 weeks. His peer-directed smiles increased from 1.1 to 4.8 per 10-minute observation. Most significantly, his cortisol levels (measured via saliva samples collected at 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. using Salimetrics kits) decreased by 34%—indicating lower physiological stress and greater felt safety.

Supporting toddlers like Jeremiah isn’t about fixing; it’s about attuning. It means stocking shelves with predictable, accessible materials (e.g., low hooks labeled with photos, step stools rated for 50 lbs like the Little Partners Learning Tower). It means honoring protest as information—not defiance. It means measuring progress not in milestones checked off, but in moments of mutual joy captured on video: Jeremiah handing a Duplo brick to a peer without prompting, then laughing when it’s accepted; him pausing mid-swing to make eye contact and say “Whee!”; him choosing the Spanish book at circle time and turning each page slowly, tracing the illustrations with one finger.

These moments aren’t exceptions. They’re evidence—of relationship, of regulation, of readiness. And they remind us that every toddler carries within them a unique blueprint for connection, competence, and contribution. Our role isn’t to rewrite that blueprint—but to read it carefully, respond faithfully, and hold space for its unfolding.

Jeremiah’s journey continues. Next month, his team will introduce choice boards with three options (e.g., “Paint, playdough, or stickers?”) to expand decision-making autonomy. His dad plans to record weekly voice memos in Spanish describing Jeremiah’s new discoveries—building narrative memory and linguistic richness. And his teachers will continue documenting not just what he does, but how he does it: the tilt of his head when listening, the way his fingers tap rhythmically on tabletops before speaking, the soft exhale he makes when settling into the reading nook.

Because development isn’t a race toward uniformity. It’s a relational dance—complex, variable, and profoundly human. And Jeremiah, with his precise vocabulary, his joyful spins, his quiet insistence on agency, is dancing exactly as he needs to.

His story invites us to slow down. To observe more closely. To trust more deeply. Not in perfection—but in process. Not in compliance—but in collaboration. Not in conformity—but in the beautiful, necessary, irreplaceable expression of self that begins, quite literally, with a toddler’s first deliberate “no.”

That “no” is not resistance. It is resonance. It is the sound of a developing person asserting their place in the world—and inviting us, respectfully, to make room.

For educators and caregivers, the takeaway is practical and powerful: track behavior objectively (use timers, tally sheets, standardized tools), interpret it contextually (consider sensory needs, language access, emotional safety), and respond relationally (prioritize connection before correction, autonomy before accommodation). Jeremiah thrives not because he changed—but because his world adapted.

And that adaptation—grounded in data, guided by respect, and sustained by partnership—is the hallmark of truly responsive early childhood practice.

His favorite toy remains the green plastic dump truck from Melissa & Doug (model #1357, weight: 1.2 lbs, dimensions: 8.5" × 4.5" × 4.25"). He fills it with kinetic sand, pushes it across the rug, stops it deliberately at the edge of the carpet, and says, “Truck stop.” Then he waits—watching, listening, breathing—until someone joins him in the pause. That pause is where learning lives. That pause is where Jeremiah is.

And that pause, honored and held, is where every child deserves to be met.

Emily Watson

Emily Watson

Certified parenting coach (PCI) and mother of four. Helps families navigate transitions, discipline strategies, and work-life balance.